Second train 'minutes away' from hitting crash wreckage

May 2nd, 2007

A SECOND train was just minutes from disaster as it narrowly avoided ploughing into the Cumbria rail crash wreckage, it emerged today.

A train travelling from Scotland to England managed to stop just a couple of hundred yards from where the Glasgow-bound Virgin Pendolino left the track on Friday night.

Had it hit the wreckage the death and injury toll of one fatality and six serious injuries would have been far worse.

The RMT union revealed the lucky escape as it was confirmed that the crash investigation would focus on a pair of emergency points to the south of the scene of the accident.

With disruption between Carlisle and Preston and Lancaster likely to continue for more than a week, initial reports suggest that crucial bolts had come loose from the points used to divert trains on to the other track during maintenance. This is a chilling echo of what happened at the Potters Bar rail crash outside London Paddington in May 2002.

To read this story in full, pick up a copy of the Evening News

Related topic

- http://news.scotsman.com/topics.cfm?tid=335
http://news.scotsman.com/topics.cfm?tid=335

Toyota ends GM’s reign as leader in global sales

May 2nd, 2007

HONG KONG: Toyota surpassed General Motors in worldwide vehicle sales during the first three months of this year, marking the end of one of the longest runs of dominance in all of global industry and another milestone in Americas long decline from unchallenged industrial pre-eminence.

Toyota announced Tuesday that its worldwide sales reached 2.35 million cars and trucks in the first quarter; GM had previously announced that its sales totaled 2.26 million vehicles in the first quarter.

GM swept past Ford in 1931 in the enormous U.S. market and in worldwide sales, and barely looked back for seven decades. But a combination of inattention to quality, poor labor relations, adverse regulatory decisions and a slowness to recognize the potential for small cars eroded GMs seemingly insurmountable lead starting in the mid-1960s.

Emerging from the ashes of Japans defeat in World War II partly thanks to U.S. assistance during the Korean War, Toyota established itself through the 1970s and 1980s as the industry standard for quality and reliability. It has since built a reputation for technological leadership as well, most notably with the Prius and other hybrid cars.

Toyota took the worldwide lead in the first quarter as it stepped up sales in every major market. GM continued to gain market share in China, but is struggling in the United States and Europe and has never been able to gain a firm foothold in the Japanese market.

GM and Toyota spokesmen were equally reluctant Tuesday to portray themselves as engaged in a global car race for leadership. GM has been trying to emphasize its future as an international automaker - three-fifths of its sales are now outside the United States - and not on the storied greatness of its past.

“Were focused on providing the best cars and trucks for our customers all around the world,” said John McDonald, a GM spokesman in Detroit. “Were not focused on a race.”

Toyota has been leery of the attention, and often the criticism, that frequently come with being the biggest in any industry. It has frequently been the main target of trade restrictions in the United States and Europe, and this has made the company cautious of being seen as too large or too aggressive.

“We look at the results as simply a reflection of how our products are viewed favorably around the world,” said Paul Nolasco, a company spokesman in Tokyo. “We dont just make them and push them out the door - we have a pull system and we build them when they are ordered.”

Industry analysts were bolder. “It is a historic moment” for Toyota, said Benjamin Asher of Automotive Resources Asia, which was acquired last year by J.D. Power Associates. “Everyone was expecting it to assume the number one position, the question was when.”

Yale Zhang, the director of greater-China vehicle forecasts for CSM Worldwide, an automotive consulting firm, said that while Toyota lags Volkswagen and GM in the fast-growing Chinese market now, it is on track to pull into the lead in 2013.

Toyota has lagged mainly because it has been slow to enter some segments of the market in China, as Chinese officials were wary of granting permission for Toyota to build factories in the 1990s given decades of Sino-Japanese rivalry. But Toyota is now expanding swiftly.

“Its pretty easy for Toyota in China given Toyotas brand image, the quality and the design of the cars,” Zhang said.

General Motors has ruled the auto industry for so long that industry statisticians scrambled to figure out the precise quarters in which it last trailed another automaker. Comparing automakers worldwide sales on anything less than an annual basis is a fairly recent phenomenon.

Ford opened its first plant outside North America in England in 1911, while GM expanded aggressively in the European market in the 1920s. But automakers had typically eschewed worldwide sales announcements until the last few years, announcing monthly and quarterly sales separately in each country instead.

This has changed as the Internet has improved communications and as automakers have begun forcing their far-flung operations to work closely together, instead of functioning as a series of separate fiefdoms.

Ford briefly overtook GM in American sales in July 1998, when a strike lasting nearly eight weeks at two GM parts factories in Flint, Michigan, triggered the shutdown of almost all of GMs assembly plants across North America. Ford also outpaced GM briefly in the autumn of 1970, when a 10-week national strike crippled GMs operations.

Over a million object but road plans go ahead

May 2nd, 2007

PETER Roberts, a 46-year-old father of two from Telford, Shropshire, can reflect on a job well done this weekend. His online petition on the Downing Street website, calling for the cancellation of plans for road pricing schemes in Britain, had last night secured more than 1.5 million signatures.

Whitehall, where plans for a new era of road pricing are being worked up, has been forced to take notice. “We did ask for a debate,” one official ruefully reflected. “My, have we got it.”

But despite Roberts’ phenomenal viral campaign, the government on both sides of the Border insist that a pay-as-you-drive system is near inevitable in the not too distant future. The only debate appears to remain over exactly how it will happen.

As we report today, ministers at Holyrood appear to have become, if anything, emboldened by the petition controversy. Tavish Scott, the Lib Dem Transport Minister at Holyrood, is pledging to enter negotiations with the Treasury to abolish car tax, and reduce fuel duty in Scotland, in order to sweeten the road pricing pill if ministers in Whitehall are scared off by the popular revolt.

That does not appear to be on the cards, with Westminster Transport Minister Douglas Alexander said to be staying firm in his approach. His plans are, in any case, already well advanced.

The government’s case for road pricing is also well rehearsed. A study by former British Airways chief executive Sir Rod Eddington declared late last year that a national road pricing scheme would cut traffic levels to 50% below what they would otherwise be in 2025.

He added that it would save the country 15bn in production which would otherwise be lost in the fumes of hundreds of thousands of traffic snarl-ups.

A road pricing scheme would charge motorists up to 1.28 per mile for using the busiest roads at peak time - raising the cost of the average 9.6-mile inner city commute to 24.57 a day. Despite the cost, Eddington described the moves as a “no-brainer”.

The technology for road pricing is already available, either as a black box fitted under a car’s bonnet, or a ‘tag’ on the windscreen.

In the former case, the box - fitted with GPS satellite tracking - would record both the time and movement of the car, leaving an electronic trail. Charges would then be sent to the motorists, with the cost dependent on the amount of traffic on the road and the time of day. Such a scheme is expected to be introduced in Abu Dhabi this year.

In the latter case - a tag and beacon system - a transmitter on a car’s windscreen would emit a signal to roadside receivers which in turn would send the data to a control centre. Again, a bill would then be sent out. A similar scheme running in Singapore has proven a success, with motorists who do not clog up roads at busy times being rewarded with lower tax bills.

Later this summer, English local authorities will be invited to bid to host the country’s first pilot scheme, which could be up and running by 2010, and rolled out across the country by 2014.

This timetable appears to be too long for Scottish ministers, who are already considering their own regional pilot in what is described as a “medium-sized urban area”. Their preference is for a UK-wide scheme - but Scott says today that he will not wait for too long.

Motoring groups remain sceptical. If busy trunk roads and motorways end up being the most expensive, drivers could swarm onto smaller roads to cut their bills.

Neil Greig, of the Institute of Advanced Motorists, said: “Most road deaths occur on single carriageways. If you put more traffic onto rural roads then you might find you don’t help road safety.”

As Peter Roberts has shown, this debate has got a long way to go yet.

Related topic

- http://news.scotsman.com/topics.cfm?tid=974
http://news.scotsman.com/topics.cfm?tid=974