Ministers consider extra flood funds
July 5th, 2007Extra money could be provided to help the thousands of people whose homes were flooded in the recent storms, ministers suggested today.
However, they refused to make any specific commitments to increasingly anxious councils in Hull and south Yorkshire.
A spokesman for the prime minister, Gordon Brown, said the government was looking at extra funding for flood-hit areas “as a matter of urgency”.
“The prime minister is keen to be kept fully informed on what’s happening,” he said. “He has spoken to the leaders of the councils in Sheffield, Doncaster and Hull in recent days.”
The communities secretary, Hazel Blears, was repeatedly challenged on funding pledges when she toured the Meadowhall shopping centre in Sheffield, which was closed for five days last week when its ground floor was swamped.
“It is absolutely vital that the local authorities, who have been in the lead and have done some fantastic work, are supported by a complete cross-government effort, and we’ll be ensuring that that happens,” she said.
“We need to look at is the existing emergency funding scheme, we need to see the extent of the damage, we need to bring all our resources to bear - not just financial but the human resources of local people, businesses, of the government offices in the regions.
“This is a national effort because we know that the problems that have been suffered by people are not going to go away once the immediate floodwater has gone away … that’s why there’s a pledge of ongoing support, particularly working with those local councils.”
Ms Blears rejected claims that the response would have been far quicker if the flooding had hit London. No ministers visited the flooded areas for the first five days, which coincided with the change of government.
The junior minister John Healey, the head of the recovery programme, gave the same message in Hull, where the number of damaged homes has topped 17,000 - approaching one-fifth of the city’s stock.
The council’s Liberal Democrat leader, Colin Minns, told him the government needed to “help us with a large injection of capital, otherwise this city will not recover”.
In Hull, the father of a young fish farm worker who died after a failed four-hour attempt to free him from a drain accused the emergency services of “virtually arguing” about what to do.
Michael Barnett, 68, said his 28-year-old son, who was also called Michael, could have been saved. “Even if it [a rescue] had broken his leg or pulled his foot off, at least he’d be alive,” he said. “But they just left him to die.”
Humberside Fire and Rescue said it could not discuss details because the death was going to a coroner’s inquest.
However, the chief fire officer, Frank Duffield, said the team involved had acted in a “dedicated and professional manner with little regard for their own safety”.
The country’s biggest insurance firm, Aviva, yesterday said it could meet around 175m of the 1bn expected in insurance claims following the floods.
The company anticipated that the claims would make a dent in its profits, and but admitted that figure could rise even further depending on the average claim made and if the bad weather continued.
Aviva has already received around 30,000 Norwich Union claims, and expects the average household figure to be below 15,000.
At least 27,000 homes and 5,000 businesses are thought to have been affected, but that number is rising daily.
Sue Winston, of Aviva, said it could take up to a month for all the claims to come through. Loss adjusters and suppliers were visiting stricken areas to process claims as quickly as possible.
Meanwhile, Royal & Sun Alliance said it expected to pay out an estimated 55m in flood claims after recoveries from its own reinsurers.
After the floods of 2000, the insurance industry paid out a total of 1.3bn, of which Aviva assumed 200m.

Posted in 