The real story behind the BBC’s cuts
September 6th, 2007The BBC likes to boast about its network of foreign correspondents, as it showed recently when it ran a series of promotional films listing dozens of cities where it has a presence. When a story breaks, it suggested, the BBC covers it far better than its rivals ‘because we are already there’.
That may not be true for long. Sources at Broadcasting House claim senior managers are lining up cuts that could result in the closure of some foreign bureaux, and a 30 per cent reduction of staff in others. ‘They have been planning cuts for some time and it is directly related to the licence fee settlement’, says a senior correspondent. Such a move would prove hugely controversial.
If there is one thing the corporation does well, it is reporting overseas news to a domestic audience and, increasingly, an international one. Even critics who regularly lambast the BBC for ‘dumbing down’ or spending too much on star presenters concede it is a good use of licence money. Some insiders believe news, and foreign news in particular, should be spared the worst of the cuts.
Plans announced earlier this year to make 10 journalists redundant, including two at the flagship news programme Newsnight, prompted strike action, and the BBC backed down. But, says the BBC correspondent, ‘they did so because they knew there were bigger battles ahead.’
There is speculation that well over 100 news staff could go. But one senior source claims: ‘That is a huge underestimate. Many hundreds of jobs are under threat in news and there are serious questions over whether the quality of programmes like Newsnight and the Ten O’Clock News can be maintained.’
It is believed the news department is planning to cut its budgets by 5 per cent a year for the next five years as part of a wider, five-year BBC business plan being drawn up by director-general Mark Thompson. The plan will be presented to the BBC Trust later this month, and trustees will be invited to comment on the proposal before it is implemented in the autumn. Many within the BBC hope it will veto plans for big cuts in news, and view it as the first big test for new chairman Sir Michael Lyons.
‘There is a huge bunfight going on,’ the source says. ‘Thompson has to decide whether to put the squeeze on across the board or axe some services - like BBC3 or BBC4 or several radio stations - completely.’
There are many within the BBC who would prefer to see other services axed to preserve news output, particularly as it has already had to make significant savings. In the run-up to the licence fee settlement, Thompson tried to demonstrate the BBC had got costs under control by axeing more than 3,000 jobs as part of his Value for Money programme. News was not spared, but departments that demonstrated greater efficiencies were told they would be handed bigger budgets after the settlement was announced.
That was when the BBC was budgeting for an above-inflation licence fee increase. The reality of a 1.5 per cent below-inflation rise is about to bite, and the latest round of cuts and savings will be far deeper. ‘There isn’t a great deal left to cut,’ says a correspondent. ‘There have already been some savings, and the output is expanding. There is more work to do, more podcasts to record, and more writing for the internet. I don’t know anyone who’s having an easy ride.’
Foreign bureaux will be reduced, insist some sources, but no decisions have been taken about which will bear the brunt. One senior source says it is unlikely that any will be shut down completely and concedes: ‘If you were a Sky or an ITN you would be saying “we do the same thing in a far more lean way” and arguing the BBC still has loads of money.’
But the current battle goes to the heart of a dilemma that BBC has wrestled with for generations - whether to chase audiences or concentrate on core services that commercial rivals can’t or won’t provide. ‘Some say we should reinforce the core public services, like news,’ says the senior BBC staffer. ‘But we’re losing young audiences and there’s a review of the licence fee in five years .’
If the nationwide tax on TV loses popular support, the very future of the corporation could be in jeopardy. In the meantime, there are some big battles looming.

Posted in 