MINISTERS have pledged to look into evidence that Scottish airports have been used by CIA “rendition flights”.

A report by UK police chiefs concluded that Britain did not allow the so-called “torture flights” to use its airports to take terror suspects out of Europe.

But aviation experts have claimed that a CIA plane landed in Britain just over a week ago.

Yesterday the justice secretary, Kenny MacAskill, invited civil liberties organisations to bring to him any evidence that they may have about Scottish airports being used for the flights.

Alex Salmond, the First Minister, and Elish Angiolini, the Lord Advocate, backed the move which was part of the SNP’S election manifesto.

Related topic

- http://news.scotsman.com/topics.cfm?tid=1227
http://news.scotsman.com/topics.cfm?tid=1227

(AP)A second young woman has come forward to claim that Southwest Airlines employees made her cover up on a recent flight, leading jet-setters to ask: Will my outfit fly?

Setara Qassim said a flight attendant confronted her during the trip from Tucson, Ariz., to Burbank, Calif., and asked whether she had a sweater to go over her green halter-style dress.

Qassim, 21, told KNBC-TV in Los Angeles she was forced to wrap a blanket around herself for the rest of the flight. She complained that if Southwest wants passengers to dress a certain way, it should publish a dress code.

Last week, 23-year-old Kyla Ebbert said a Southwest employee pulled her aside as she was preparing to board a plane departing San Diego for Tucson in July and told her she was dressed too provocatively to fly.

Ebbert, who took her case to NBC’s “Today Show,” said she was allowed on the plane after adjusting her sweater and short skirt. She said she was humiliated and felt the stares of other passengers who had overheard the verbal dressing-down.

Dallas-based Southwest Airlines Co. acknowledged the incident involving Ebbert, but airline spokesman Chris Mainz said the company had no record that Qassim ever complained.

Messages left with Qassim at her California home were not immediately returned to The Associated Press.

Southwest - which dressed its stewardesses in hot pants and called itself “the love airline” back in the 1970s - relies on employees to decide whether a passenger’s attire may offend other customers, Mainz said.

“We don’t have a dress code. We rely on our employees to use common sense, good judgment and good taste,” Mainz said. “It’s so rare for us to have to address a customer’s clothing issue.”

American Airlines claims the right to refuse to carry passengers for a variety of reasons, including being drunk, barefoot, having an offensive odor or being “clothed in a manner that would cause discomfort or offense to other passengers.”

“It’s generally a graphic on a T-shirt that might be uncomfortable” to another passenger, said American Airlines spokesman Tim Wagner. “We always find ways to mitigate it as best possible, with not allowing someone on a flight being the last option.”

David Castelveter, spokesman for the Air Transport Association, the trade group of the major U.S. airlines, said he didn’t know of any airline having a dress code for passengers.

Lynda White, who teaches etiquette classes and calls herself “The First Lady of Manners,” said many young people have gotten lax on what to wear and how to act - possibly influenced by Hollywood stars. She recommends “business-casual” outfits for the plane because you might be seated next to a potential employer or business contact.

“If you wear provocative clothing, tattoos, or you smell of alcohol or cigarettes, who’s going to believe you?” she said.

(Christian Science Monitor)This article was written by Daniel B. Wood.

Pointing south from the corner of Figueroa and Adams in South Central L.A., Tanisha Jackson says when it comes to fast food, her community “has it all.”
“If you want it cheap and quick - McDonald’s, Burger King, Taco Bell, Kentucky Fried Chicken - we’ve got it,” says the mother of two.

Some city officials see the myriad fast-food outlets as a health problem and are seeking change. “Fast food is primarily the only option for those who live and work here,” says City Councilwoman Jan Perry. “It’s become a public-health issue that residents be given healthier choices.”

She has introduced a two-year moratorium on new fast-food outlets in this part of the city, where small, single-family homes dominate and gangs thrive in a rough urban landscape.

Many national food and health experts say the measure - which is slated for a vote on Sept. 18 - may be the first example of a health-zoning law in the United States. In 2006, New York City health committee chairman Joel Rivera lobbied against uncontrolled growth of fast-food chains, but did not introduce legislation. These observers are applauding the idea as a way to raise awareness about America’s obesity epidemic, which hits poorer neighborhoods disproportionately.

“Limiting fast food could be a practical solution if it starts to address the imbalance of too many outlets with food that is not nutritious,” says Mark Vallianatos, director of the Center for Food and Justice at Occidental College in Los Angeles.

Others say it is a well-meaning but misguided attempt by government to control social behavior, doomed to failure, like prohibition in the 1920s. “You can’t regulate the supply side of a behavioral problem and expect results,” says Dennis Lombardi, executive vice president of Foodservice Strategies, a consulting firm for the restaurant industry.

Perry says she introduced the legislation because statistics show that residents here have higher incidence of diseases that doctors link to obesity than the rest of the city and the county. “The side effect of a constant diet of fast food is that society pays in the long run in medical costs,” she says.

The ordinance would affect about 700,000 residents of South Central, where a recent Los Angeles Times survey found that 46 percent of restaurants are fast-food chains, compared with 12 percent on the west side of Los Angeles.

Perry and her supporters acknowledge that health zoning raises some questions: Will other healthier restaurants move into the region if new fast-food outlets are prohibited? Can the city government aid that transition? Will residents frequent restaurants with healthier options?

“We should always be very cautious about restricting food and dining options for other groups of people,” says Barry Glassner, professor of sociology at the University of Southern California and author of “The Gospel of Food: Everything You Think You Know About Food Is Wrong.”

He and others cite several benefits fast-food restaurants offer to those living in poorer neighborhoods: good, inexpensive food; a safe environment for kids; and fast preparation, which is particularly appealing to single parents, many of whom work more than one job.

“If a particular community wants to kick out certain kinds of food, that is one thing. For outsiders to do it is patronizing and demeaning,” says Dr. Glassner. “Calling all fast food evil is just too simplistic.”

Still, others hold more moderate views. Kathleen Hall of the Stress Institute of Atlanta agrees that healthier eating contributes to a longer, more satisfying life. Besides food zoning, efforts must include educating youths about food, countering media influences, and promoting the importance of families eating together in quiet environments, she says.

“We have to teach inner-city kids how to eat or they will find the less healthy foods even at the better restaurants,” she says. “Many of these fast-food outlets are actually offering healthier items, but they don’t promote them as much as the fattier stuff because they make more money off the big meals.”

Burger King, for example, has announced it will roll out apple slices in French-fry cups for kids’ meals this fall. Earlier this year, Subway introduced a healthy kids menu, offering raisins or sliced apples instead of chips.

But more needs to be done to encourage healthier eating. Education means giving a higher priority to the health hazards of eating the wrong kinds of foods. In this sense, the proposal in L.A. could help create a more enlightened civic environment about public health.

“Los Angeles’s ordinance is helping the community face the fact that there is collective responsibility in this as well as personal responsibility,” says Christine Ferguson, director of the Stop Obesity Alliance in Washington.

But Perry and other health officials say they are not trying to play father figure to residents or even eliminate fast food from the city scene.

“The grocery stores in this area are terrible if you want healthy fresh fruits and vegetables,” says Lark Galloway-Gilliam, executive director of L.A.-based Community Health Councils, a health policy advocacy group, and also a resident of South Central.

After the Rodney King riots in 1992 devastated these neighborhoods, officials promised more supermarkets and restaurants, she says. But for a variety of reasons, that has not happened.

“Sure, I can get a healthy salad at Whole Foods, if I want to drive 10 to 12 miles and take half an hour. This is not about regulating business; it’s about planning communities and giving people healthy choices,” Ms. Galloway-Gilliam says.