IBA Health close to buying iSoft

February 21st, 2008

AUSTRALIANe-health company IBA Health’s long, $410 million battle to absorb British-based rival iSoft looks close to success.

CompuGROUP of Germany has declined to increase its bid of 66 pence a share to top IBA’s offer of 69p, or a mix of cash and shares equivalent to about 70p.

“The other side has conceded,” said IBA executive chairman Gary Cohen. “The acquisition will now proceed. I spoke with iSoft’s chairman last night.”

A key factor was that IBA had acquired more than 25 per cent of iSoft’s shares, effectively preventing CompuGROUP from obtaining the required 75 per cent of shareholder agreement to its bid.

A statement to the German Stock Exchange, issued from Koblenz by CompuGROUP chairman Frank Goptthardt said: “iSOFT would have been an excellent complement to our international business activities, but CompuGROUP does not intend to enter into a contest that would lead to prices and risks that are unreasonable.

This would not create value for our shareholders.” Mr Cohen said IBA Health expected to complete the takeover by the end of October and then set about integrating the companies to form the world’s fourth-largest e-health and health information technology company, handling clinical and financial data.

Among the merged company’s principal targets will be a share of the $31 billion the British Government will invest in its planned National Program for IT (NPfIT).

“The company headquarters will be consolidated in Australia, but we will maintain a strong management presence in the UK,” Mr Cohen said. He said job losses overall should be few.

IBA Health shares rose $6.5п to $1.045.

Moscow deepens ties to Iran’s energy sector

February 21st, 2008

DUBAI: As the United States warns the world away from business with Tehran, Moscow is deepening its ties to Irans energy sector, underscoring Russias differences with Washington over Iranian nuclear plans and Kosovos independence.

While the timing of Moscows announcement on Tuesday may have been political, the deal for Gazprom, the Russian state-controlled energy giant, to take on big new Iranian oil and gas projects dovetails with Gazproms strategic ambitions, analysts said.

Gazprom, the worlds biggest gas producer, plans to play a larger role in developing Irans giant South Pars gas field, and will also drill for oil.

“The Russian government and the United States are at loggerheads over how to engage with Iran, with Russia actively favouring a more open relationship,” said Ronald Smith, chief strategist at Alfa Bank. “This makes Gazprom rather indifferent to American policy wishes.”

The U.S. accuses Iran of using uranium enrichment to develop weapons, while Tehran says it needs nuclear power. Russia has been reluctant to impose more U.N. sanctions on Iran.

Although the Kremlin has voiced its own concerns about Tehrans ambitions, it is building Irans first nuclear power plant and has supplied the fuel it will use.

“There is probably a political element given what happened last week in Kosovo,” said Chris Weafer, chief strategist at UralSib bank.

Russia opposes Kosovos split from Serbia, which the U.S. has backed. Despite growing clout on the world stage, Moscow has proved powerless to prevent Kosovo announcing its independence this week.

“I would say this investment is in keeping with Gazproms declared position to become as global as possible but the timing of the announcement clearly has a political message as well.”

Gazprom is advancing in Iran while U.S. political pressure has delayed progress on gas projects by European companies such as Total and Royal Dutch Shell. It has also led some European banks to pull financing for Iranian oil deals.

With European and U.S. companies out of the competition, Gazprom has an edge as it bids for a bigger role in developing the worlds second-largest gas reserves after Russias own.

“The Russians know full well that they are at a disadvantage in terms of the quality of their technology compared to the West under normal circumstances,” said Ali Rashidi, a university economics professor in Iran.

“Under conditions that Iran cannot attract real rather than token Western foreign investment, the Russians are in an ideal situation to fill the void.”

Gazprom may also have been able to negotiate better terms due to the lack of competition and Irans eagerness to press ahead with development despite U.N. and U.S. sanctions, Rashidi said.

Strategically, a tie-up between Moscow and Tehran makes sense, analysts said. Gazproms major market is Europe, which would also be the likely destination for much of Irans future production. Gazprom supplies a quarter of Europes gas needs.

The deal with Iran will do little to help Gazproms ambition to boost its presence in the United States.

But for now, its exposure there is small, analysts said. That, and Europes dependence on Gazprom, would limit the effectiveness of any reprisal action from the United States, said Teymur Huseynov, head of the Eurasia department at risk consultancy Exclusive Analysis.

“Gazproms vulnerability to U.S. sanctions is minimal,” Huseynov said. “And if you put sanctions on Gazprom you are basically threatening Europes energy security and that would strain the relationship with Europe and the United States.”

Increased coordination between the two countries on investment policy and pricing would also boost the chances of the formation of a gas producers group resembling the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, Huseynov said.

Iran has called on Russia to set up such a group, which has caused jitters in top customers and politicians in Europe.

Gazprom could also help Iran develop its pipeline system, potentially linking the north of the country to fields in the south, Huseynov added. That would lessen dependency on gas imported from Turkmenistan, which angered Tehran when it cut off gas supplies at the end of December.

The Russian gas export monopoly owns all the gas pipelines in Armenia, to which Iran has recently completed a new export pipeline. Gazprom will operate the section of that pipeline in Armenia.

Gazprom has been involved in Iran for years and invested about $4 billion in the country between 2000-2007, said Huseynov. It was involved in an earlier phase of development at South Pars with Total and Malaysias Petronas.

Gunner killed in Afghan blast is named

February 21st, 2008

A GUNNER based at RAF Lossiemouth who was killed in an explosion in southern Afghanistan was named yesterday.

The Ministry of Defence said that Senior Aircraftman Christopher Bridge, 20, from Sheffield, of 51 Squadron, RAF Regiment, died in the blast in the early hours of Thursday morning.

A civilian interpreter was also killed in the attack outside Kandahar airfield, the main hub for NATO forces flying in and out of southern Afghanistan.

Two other servicemen, also from the RAF Regiment, and a second interpreter suffered minor injuries.

The death is the latest tragedy to hit the military bases in Moray. It comes almost exactly a year after a Nimrod from neighbouring RAF Kinloss crashed near Kandahar, killing 14 people aboard. A memorial service will be held tomorrow to mark the anniversary.

Yesterday the flag at RAF Lossiemouth was flying at half mast. Local people laid floral tributes at the gates of the complex.

Group Captain Mark Roberts, the commanding officer at RAF Lossiemouth, said: “An inquiry has been set up to examine the facts of the incident. Our prayers and thoughts go to the families of those involved.”

Related topic

- «news.scotsman.com»
http://news.scotsman.com/topics.cfm?tid=444