First sex-swap mayor to be sworn in

March 19th, 2008

A female councillor who was born a man is due to become the UK’s first transgender mayor today, the Local Government Association said.

Liberal Democrat Jenny Bailey, 45, who underwent a sex change operation when she was in her 30s, is likely to be sworn in as the civic leader of Cambridge city council at a ceremony today.

The mayoress is expected to be her partner, former councillor Jennifer Liddle, 49, who also underwent a sex swap.

Ms Bailey, who has two children aged 20 and 18 and was once married, has served on Cambridge city council with her partner. The couple met while undergoing hormone replacement therapy.

A spokesman for the Local Government Association said Ms Bailey would be the first transgender mayor in the UK but a spokesman for Cambridge city council said the couple would not be disclosing their previous identities.

Ms Bailey said: “I entered local politics because I believe in public service and because I wanted to make a contribution to the wonderful city we live in.

“I am honoured that my fellow councillors have now chosen me to be mayor.”

Rob Hammond, chief executive of Cambridge city council, said: “I’m confident Ms Bailey will be a great ambassador for Cambridge.

“I am aware that there will be interest in Ms Bailey’s male-to-female gender reassignment.

“It is the council’s firm view that someone’s gender and sexual orientation has no bearing on their suitability to hold public office.

“What matters is the person’s ability to do the job and to do it well and that is how they should be judged. We believe it is wrong to discriminate on the grounds of a person’s gender or sexuality.

“When Ms Bailey is confirmed in post it will be business as usual for the council.”

Ian Nimmo-Smith, leader of Cambridge city council, said: “I am looking forward to supporting Jenny as she takes the leading role in Cambridge’s civic life for the coming year.

“Jenny has fulfilled the role of deputy mayor in the past year with great distinction and we already know that she will make a really great mayor.”

U.S. announces plan to ease capital restraints on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac

March 19th, 2008

WASHINGTON: The U.S. government Wednesday announced that it would free up billions of dollars at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, money that would be used to help homeowners refinance mortgages on the brink of default.

The U.S. treasury secretary, Henry Paulson Jr., said the changes would the two government housing finance enterprises to strengthen the U.S. mortgage market.

The Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight, which oversees the government-sponsored companies, made public a plan to ease mandatory capital requirements now in place. It said the plan was expected to result in an immediate infusion of up to $200 billion into the market for mortgage-backed securities.

“Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are significant participants in the mortgage market and I am encouraged that todays announcement will make more financing available in this area,” Paulson said in a statement. “Additional capital will enable the companies to help more homeowners and will strengthen the underlying fundamentals of the mortgage market.”

The mandatory cash cushion for Fannie and Freddie - now nearly $20 billion for the two - will be reduced by one-third under the new arrangement. The money will go toward buying mortgages of struggling homeowners to enable them to refinance into more affordable loans.

Japanese Parliament again rejects government effort to name central bank successor

March 19th, 2008

TOKYO: As the monetary authorities in Washington and elsewhere fight to contain the deepening financial crisis, Japan may have added to their problems by failing to find a new leader for its central bank on Wednesday.

The top post at the Bank of Japan now sits empty after a political standoff in Parliament blocked selection of a successor to the current governor, whose five-year term ended on Wednesday.

The standoff in Parliament came to a head on Wednesday when the upper house, which is controlled by the opposition, rejected the governments last-minute effort to fill the position, vetoing its second nominee in a week.

The defeat has been widely seen here as a damaging political setback to an already unpopular prime minister, Yasuo Fukuda, who has been increasingly blamed for the banks leadership vacuum.

Until the position can be filled, world economic leaders now face the uncomfortable prospect of having no leader at the Bank of Japan, the central bank of the worlds second-largest economy.

Economists and former bank officials call it a humiliating situation for a country that has been trying for years to assume an international political role commensurate with its $5 trillion economy.

“Its a national disgrace,” said Mikio Wakatsuki, a former executive director at the bank who is now chairman of AXA Life Insurance of Japan.

“Japan is at risk of becoming the missing link in multinational efforts.”

The biggest problem, Wakatsuki and others said, is the blow to confidence in Japans ability to manage its own economy, particularly at a time of global financial turmoil. While the deputy governor will step in to run day-to-day affairs at the bank, a high profile vacancy will only raise further worries about Japans direction as its growth stalls and economic policy appears increasingly adrift.

World economic leaders may also feel the loss. Lack of a chief means there will be no one at the Japanese central bank to confer regularly with overseas counterparts like the Federal Reserves chairman, Ben Bernanke.

Former central bankers say such informal discussions are important to work out joint moves or weigh the wisdom of market interventions.

Moreover, Japan has a lot to offer to other central banks in the current crisis, former central bank officials here said. The country is the only major economy to have recently weathered a housing market meltdown and resulting banking crisis on a similar scale to the problems in the United States. Indeed, Japanese central bankers are eager to point out the parallels between their nations financial collapse in the early 1990s and what is happening now in the American economy.

“We have faced a problem of the same magnitude before,” said Takashi Anzai, a former Bank of Japan official who is now president of Seven Bank, a retail bank based in Tokyo. “We bring rich experience to the table.”

Anzai said a vacancy at the central bank also hamstrings Japan from taking more aggressive action to prop up the slowing global economy. He said a central bank leader could help stimulate Japans now lackluster domestic demand, turning the nation into a new engine of growth as the American economy sputters.

“We are the No. 2 economy, after all,” he said. “When America is in trouble, there must be more we can do.”

For the time being, however, Tokyo has shown itself able to offer little more than political gridlock and finger-pointing.

The main opposition party, the Democratic Party of Japan, has warned for weeks it would not approve nominees who come from the nations powerful Ministry of Finance, saying they would undermine the central banks independence. Despite the warnings, both candidates offered in the past week by Fukuda held top posts at the ministry.

Both sides have blamed the other for the impasse.

But public opinion seems to be turning increasingly against Fukuda, especially after he unveiled the second nominee, Koji Tanami, a former vice finance minister who now heads the Japan Bank for International Cooperation.

Even many members of his own party, the Liberal Democratic Party, or LDP, expressed disbelief at Fukudas seemingly stubborn insistence on nominating former ministry officials.

Political analysts said the choice reinforced the public perception that the prime minister was under the thumb of powerful ministry bureaucrats, as traditionally has been the case here. They said this would only strengthen the opposition Democrats, who have gained popularity recently by vowing to change politics as usual in Japan.

Political analysts speculated that Fukuda either grossly underestimated the opposition by the Democrats, or simply could not come up with a more appealing candidate in time. Either way, they said, he has the most to lose from a prolonged stalemate, which could force him to resign by eroding support within his party.